▲ S&P 500 +—%|▲ Stock Advisor +—%Join The Motley Fool
NYSE · As of 10:28 AM ET 10/21/26
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore58/100
Key data points
Market capMarket cap calculated using publicly traded s outstanding only. Does not include unlisted, private, or dual-class non-traded s. Implied market cap may vary.$83.82B
Day’s range$98.47 – $99.17
52wk range$86.30 – $122.41
Volume798.7K
Avg volume4.8M
Gross margin18.30%
Dividend yield6.66%
Why the guidance change isn’t good news
Superficially, it’s an increase in revenue guidance and also an increase over the implied guidance of $8.611 billion I calculated above. However, there are two key considerations for investors, and they matter a lot for the upcoming results of a company with a near-7% dividend yield.
First, the new guidance implies an adjusted operating margin of 9.48%, down from the 9.6% initially forecast. Second, it’s important to understand the nuance of the guidance change. As previously discussed, due to rising fuel costs, UPS raised fuel surcharges by $1.173 billion in the first half. Bearing in mind that the increase in full-year revenue guidance was $1.5 billion to $91.2 billion, it’s reasonable to expect a large chunk of the revenue increase is due to the fuel surcharge.
Turning to the difficult question of how much profit UPS is making from the fuel surcharges, its fuel cost and third-party costs increased by $744 million, resulting in a net difference of $429 million — a figure slightly more than the increase in adjusted operating profit guidance.
![]()
Image source: Getty Images.
To be clear, management’s position is that the fuel surcharge is intended solely to cover increased fuel costs, and there are associated costs related to fuel disruptions as well. Moreover, CFO Brian Dykes argued that “the net impact to consolidated operating profit dollars was modest” on the second-quarter earnings call.
In the absence of knowing exactly what kind of figure “modest” implies, it could be argued that the combination of a positive contribution from fuel surcharges over fuel cost — something not ly to prove sustainable — actually implies a significant decrease in adjusted operating profit margin if the impact of fuel is taken out.
The key metric to look out for
As noted, this is the year when UPS should start to build on margin improvement, not least because it finished the so-called “glide down” of Amazon deliveries by 50% (volume) from the start of 2025 to the middle of 2026. That’s why investors are so focused on margin, particularly the expected adjusted operating profit margin in the U.S. domestic package segment.
I’ve replicated what the Wall Street consensus, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence, is expecting for the segment, and the company’s total adjusted operating margins will be below. As is often the case with Wall Street estimates, the full-year U.S. Domestic Package margin guidance mirrors management’s 7.5% guidance given on the last earnings call.
|
Adjusted Operating Profit |
Q1 2026 |
Q2 2026 |
Q3 2026 Est |
Q4 2026 Est |
Full Year 2026 Est |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
U.S. Domestic Package |
4% |
7.96% |
6.98% |
10.56% |
7.53% |
|
Total company |
6.24% |
9.21% |
8.92% |
12.65% |
9.4% |
Data source: S&P Global Market Intelligence.
Watch UPS’s margin guidance
All told, in the absence of management disclosing the exact figure, it’s hard to know exactly how much fuel surcharges are adding to the blue chip stock’s profitability. However, management has guided to a full-year U.S. Domestic Package adjusted operating profit margin of 7.5%, and the implied total company adjusted operating margin guidance is 9.48%.
Any failure to maintain those figures or meet the Wall Street analyst consensus in the table in the third quarter would suggest its margin trajectory isn’t quite what most hope for. That said, if UPS beats both expectations, the margin expansion story will support the case for the stock.
Read Next

•By Patrick Sanders
SpaceX and Tesla Form Merger Exploration Committee That Excludes Elon Musk

•By Sean Williams

•By Sara Appino
Bloom Energy vs. Vistra: Which Energy Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

•By Lee Samaha
GE Vernova’s $176 Billion Backlog, Explained

•By Daniel Sparks
Bloom Energy Is Down 36% From Its June Record. Should You Buy Before Thursday’s Report?

•By Eric Volkman
L3Harris Wins $876 Million Next Generation Jamming Contract
About the Author
Lee Samaha is a contributing Stock Market Analyst at The Motley Fool covering industrials, electricals, energy, materials, transportation, and infrastructure stocks. Prior to The Motley Fool, Lee was a Civil Engineer and Investment Manager. He holds a Bachelor of Civil and Structural Engineering from Southampton University and a Certificate in Investment Management from Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment. Lee first cut his investing teeth on The Motley Fool bulletin boards (commonly referred to as the “Fool Boards,”) and he’s infinitely grateful to all of the investors he learned from in this powerful investing community.
Stocks Mentioned

United Parcel Service
NYSE: UPS
$98.98
(+0.47%)+$0.46
![]()
Motley Fool Stock Advisor’s Latest Pick
—% Avg Return
*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.
Premium Investing Services
Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool’s premium services.
Sumber Artikel:
Fool.com
