Galeanu Mihai/Getty Images
The European Green Deal runs on data, from corporate disclosures to climate-risk analyses and decarbonization pathways. But much of this data feeds platforms and tools developed outside the European Union, which could threaten the bloc’s climate agenda and even its foundational values.
Listen to this commentary Please log in to listen to this commentary 0:00 / 0:00 Audio unavailable
Over the past decade, for example, the of ESG (environmental, social, governance) and climate datasets and models owned or controlled by non-EU actors has steadily grown. Now, according to the PARC Foundation’s ESG Data Cartography, more than 80% of the ESG data volume used in the EU falls into this category.
This concentration of control creates an asymmetry. Europe writes the rules, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, that are responsible for generating vast amounts of data: corporate disclosures, green taxonomies, climate-risk analyses, decarbonization pathways, and just-transition policies. But the analytical tools that turn these data into power are overwhelmingly non-European.
Two Nobel laureates on Europe’s innovation problem, creative destruction, and more
Philippe Aghion and Simon Johnson sit down for our next Insider Interview to discuss creative destruction, the rise of AI, and what it would take to unlock European dynamism.
Watch their conversation
What makes the asymmetry particularly troubling is its cumulative effect. The raw data feed models that improve with scale and the most advanced systems become ever more dominant and difficult to replace. Over time, this dynamic could lock Europe into a dependency on the foreign-owned infrastructure that captures the economic value of ESG data. Such ownership concentration is not only a sovereignty risk, but also a competitiveness trap.
AI is accelerating the process. While traceability of training data—along with documentation and auditability—is a prerequisite for AI access to EU markets, that is not necessarily how it works in practice, especially because compliance deadlines are still far away. And while it is conceivable that large language models could act as effective safeguards against climate-skeptic narratives on social media, they have tended to exhibit regressive complacency biases and, in some cases, regurgitate falsehoods. Research by PARC shows a significant gap between Grok and DeepSeek in terms of spreading climate misinformation.
Efforts to make these data publicly accessible have fallen short of their potential. The Net-Zero Data Public Utility (now called the Climate Data Utility), launched in 2022 to create a centralized, open repository for climate transition-related data from companies worldwide, has stalled. wise, the scope of the European Single Access Point, which is set to go live in 2027, has narrowed amid a simplification push.
Europe’s green transition rests on an informational infrastructure that it does not control. In February, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright reportedly asked the International Energy Agency to abandon its climate scenarios, long regarded as the global benchmark for decarbonization pathways, and the closest thing to a d net-zero scripture that the world has. This episode highlights how contested an agreed theory of change can become. At stake is more than the execution of specific policies; the EU’s entire climate agenda and even its foundational values could come under threat.
Of course, the answer is not digital autarky. Instead of cutting itself off from the rest of the world, Europe must promote freedom of choice. As the European Parliament made clear in its January 22 resolution on European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure, the first step is to map the EU’s dependencies. ing that operational challenge for the bloc, the next is to develop alternative architectures: modular, interoperable, locally governed data ecosystems that can ensure continuity for scientific and industrial uses.
Data sovereignty is more than a political slogan; it could determine Europe’s ability to produce its own knowledge. To remain a leading scientific and industrial force in climate policy, renewable energy, and sustainability, the EU must secure access to the underlying data and analytics. That requires taking Ratso’s warning seriously.
Featured
-
Negotiating With the Antichrist
Jun 10, 2026 Nina L. Khrushcheva
-
Where Is China’s Trillion-Dollar Trade Surplus Going?
Jun 9, 2026 Miao Yanliang
-
Autocracy Is Fueling Mexico’s Fiscal Deterioration
Jun 8, 2026 Guillermo Ortiz
-
Putting American Science on a MAGA Leash
Jun 4, 2026 Stephen Holmes
-
Europe’s Competitiveness Bogeyman
Jun 4, 2026 Daniel Gros
https://prosyn.org/PScjir7
It appears that you have not yet updated your first and last name. If you would to update your name, please do so here.
Please wait, fetching the form
Please wait, fetching the form
Please wait, fetching the form
Please wait, fetching the form
Please wait, fetching the form
Please wait, fetching the form
Please wait, fetching the form
Sumber Artikel:
Project-syndicate.org
